-oopsibeatu-
Member:
Posts: 20

I was chip-leader (cs=3950) in a $5 STT when everyone folded to the SB (cs=2055) who limped on my AT in the BB. BB=150 so I made a standard raise to 450, and he pushed allin. From his play so far I put him on a small PP as soon as he pushed. He raises all his big As preflop and would fold junk to a raise.

After his push there was 2505 in the pot and I had to call another 1605. I think in a cash game this would be an insta-call, but I'm not sure a call is justified in a STT here.

If I fold my CS=3500
If I call and win the coin flip my CS=6005
If I call and lose the flip my CS=1895

What would you guys do here. Any ideas and thoughts on this situation appreciated.

PokerStars Game #31932441854: Tournament #189253358, $5.00+$0.50 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2009/08/22 15:49:13 ET
Table '189253358 1' 9-max Seat #8 is the button
Seat 4: -OopsIBeatU- (3950 in chips)
Seat 6: Jelleh (3085 in chips)
Seat 7: milazzo (2675 in chips)
Seat 8: daxinanlin (1735 in chips)
Seat 9: XlXScottyXlX (2055 in chips)
XlXScottyXlX: posts small blind 75
-OopsIBeatU-: posts big blind 150
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to -OopsIBeatU- [Ts Ac]
Jelleh: folds
milazzo: folds
daxinanlin: folds
XlXScottyXlX: calls 75
-OopsIBeatU-: raises 300 to 450
XlXScottyXlX: raises 1605 to 2055 and is all-in
-OopsIBeatU-: calls 1605
*** FLOP *** [2s 5d Ks]
*** TURN *** [2s 5d Ks] [8d]
*** RIVER *** [2s 5d Ks 8d] [7c]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
XlXScottyXlX: shows [8h 8s] (three of a kind, Eights)
-OopsIBeatU-: shows [Ts Ac] (high card Ace)
XlXScottyXlX collected 4110 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 4110 | Rake 0
Board [2s 5d Ks 8d 7c]
Seat 4: -OopsIBeatU- (big blind) showed [Ts Ac] and lost with high card Ace
Seat 6: Jelleh folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 7: milazzo folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: daxinanlin (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: XlXScottyXlX (small blind) showed [8h 8s] and won (4110) with three of a kind, Eights

haowang010
Member:
Posts: 23

i think a minraise is sufficent, u never wanna get priced in to call with AT. and ur not really priced in to call with AT there either. def fold pre at that level after a shove for 2k into ur raise.

DudleyDawson
Member:
Posts: 45

I like your raise, but I think I would fold to the SBs limp/raise. But that also depends on yours and your opponent's table image. Have you seen your opp. make similar moves with junk hands and/or being a LAGtard? Have you been raising a lot PF...maybe even punishing limpers?

rocketry
Member:
Posts: 31

good raise after the limp but you have to fold this all the time.. you have such a nice stack and losing this is going to hurt it far to much.. the only time your going to ever be happy when you call is if he has A2 through A9 and every other time your going to be spewing chips

zimmah
Member:
Posts: 1

Statiscly, like you said, in a cash game, it would have been a good call.

given the pot odds were like 2.5 to 1 (slightly higher) and the odds AT to 88 (or any other low pair) is 46 to 54, almost equal. so that means, chipwise, it's a good call if you have at least 1:1 pot odds. However if your read was wrong and he did have a high pocket pair (TT or higher) that would give you a lot less chances (cuz a T on the flop is not gunna save you then) so any TT+ hand would give you only 30% to win the hand (which is against the odds btw) the same odds apply for AJ or higher. that's a lot of hands he could have that would give you the wrong odds. but even if your read was good (which is was in this case) still there is another point you should take into considation.

since you was in a tourny playing that hand, and since you were chipleader, there was no reason playing that hand, even tho chipwise it would be a good call, there is still a 54% chance you'd lose about half of your chips, losing your position as a chipleader, while all you had to do to stay in the lead was to fold (and wait for another good hand).

so when you are in a tournament, you should also look at the 'tournament odds' in adition of the pot odds and your outs. If you are in the lead there is nothing wrong with playing aggresive, however be cautious not to give away your position if you don't have to.

Hope that helps.

jaslusher
Member:
Posts: 23

With the chip lead and 5 players left, I don't see playing a bunch of coin flips. If someone is playing back against your raise you can guarantee you are at best a coin flip and it's not worth it at that point. I say let it go and keep pressuring the small stacks.

Ian DePaul
Member:
Posts: 1

Just let it go.

No reason to risk half your stack against his push. A10 looks nice but in reality it's unwired and only halfway kicked.

Everyone folded to the small blind you say. Which means there was a whopping 225 at stake. I wouldn't have raised against an average stacker. A leaner stack can have the small blind stolen with a min-raise, which limits your contribution in case he calls and you hit no piece of the flop. At the same time a fat stack might fold to 3xBB because there's no reason to get involved for him with anything but a premium hand.

OF COURSE table image and stats come into play. This is just my general feeling given no details of the players I'm with.

Hope that makes sense.

savageman77
Member:
Posts: 43

I agree with everyone above and would wait for a better spot/hand to defend. Your never going to be strong favorite against many hands with A10o and while I do agree with the raise for information, when you get the information you were looking for what do you do with it? A good question to ask yourself is are you the one dictating the action or are you being asked to call off a large portion of your stack while guessing???

Just my 2cents.....

Glasses Good Luck!

elektrosushi
Member:
Posts: 28

This could be simply good play by the small blind imho. Give him some credits for it and fold. As others have pointed out, this simply isn't your spot. I would only call him down with +KQs, but even that would depend on how this guy has behaved throughout the tournament. If he has been very very tight, I would only call with +QQ

Alex Burlton
Member:
Posts: 277

^why are you advising to fold ATo here but then saying you would call off with KQs+?

henrypaulc
Member:
Posts: 204

well basically. i disagree with most of the people. I dont like ur raise if u are not going to go with it, A10 is a good hand blind v blind. Alot of the time he puts you on a steal and the rest of the time you arent much of a dog against anything except AA, AK, AJ, AQ. ur about 38% against everything else. id say call after your initial raise.

wshuwerhere
Member:
Posts: 21

henrypaulc wrote:
well basically. i disagree with most of the people. I dont like ur raise if u are not going to go with it, A10 is a good hand blind v blind. Alot of the time he puts you on a steal and the rest of the time you arent much of a dog against anything except AA, AK, AJ, AQ. ur about 38% against everything else. id say call after your initial raise.

I very much disagree here. This would be a horrible mistake to call here. His raise could have been 2.5xbb, but its fine. He should not be raising here with the intention of stacking off to a sb limp/push. His range is pretty tight and most of it beats you. I would say A10+, 44+ is perfectly reasonable here for someone who limped the sb then decides to push. We dont have many reads on villain so i included a few hands I dont think we would normally see. That being said, its still a pretty tight range and we dont beat any of it. Even if we add KQ, A8 and A9 I would not feel very comfortable.

The blinds are still small enough that he can raise/fold here. His limp seems like a trap to me and I dont think Im taking this risk with the blinds still so small. If the blinds were larger, I wouldnt have as much respect for the villains raise and would have to call. I also would probably be pushing anyway.

franxic
Member:
Posts: 47

might seem like a joke to some of u but i highly recommend checking preflop.

I want to see a cheap flop in position here. By raising u push hands out u dominate like JT which would be hard to fold in an unraised heads-up pot when u both hit. If u miss the flop and he bets u can get away easily. Otherwise just bet for value.

U turn ur hand into a bluff if u get shoved, calling is not an option here. U just pray for A2-9 if u do. Even if i somehow see he has K9 i would consider folding given my good chip-position and the low blinds which both give me enough space and time to find better spots against people who need to shove ATC in later rounds or push into my big pair. With higher blinds i tend to shove preflop to max my FE.

The only hands i would raise here are rags i can fold easily on a shove, or hands i can easily call with.

In this special spot u raise pretty big imo. If i raise mostly raise 2,5BB here since ur in position having a big advantage postflop. If villain does not have a hand he will fold anyway since he was raised from a player in position. Calling ur raise is mostly no option for a villain with a brain, so ur bigger raise has no benefit at all, since he will push or fold 95% of the time, 5% will be slowplays with big hands. The only situation i raise bigger is against a notorious calling-station.

Aggression is key in this stage of a sng, especially in blind vs. blind confrontations. But if u raise u need a plan just in case villain plays back at u. with AT ur in a situation where folding and calling both can be a major mistake, so avoid these spots.

gl at the tables

Frank

wshuwerhere
Member:
Posts: 21

that would make sense if this was a cash game or a deep stacked mtt, but this is a stt and you dont have enough time to play like this. you raise when you are favored to be ahead and fold when you dont. playing fancy poker doesnt work in stts.

franxic
Member:
Posts: 47

can u explain why or is this just eternal truth? u raise every hand better than average here cos fancy poker does not work in stt´s?

i play like i said all the time, it´s a cheap chance to play a good pot.

raising in this situation has exactly which benefit? make better hands fold? worse hands call? both will rarely be the case imo.

u raise as a bluff induce but don´t call a push?

u want to create a big pot preflop to commit u both in the hand?

explain please, i don´t get it

wshuwerhere
Member:
Posts: 21

franxic wrote:
can u explain why or is this just eternal truth? u raise every hand better than average here cos fancy poker does not work in stt´s?

i play like i said all the time, it´s a cheap chance to play a good pot.

raising in this situation has exactly which benefit? make better hands fold? worse hands call? both will rarely be the case imo.

u raise as a bluff induce but don´t call a push?

u want to create a big pot preflop to commit u both in the hand?

explain please, i don´t get it

I guess you prefer the passive aggressive approach huh? I should have guessed as much.

If you play like you said all the time you are a very predictable player and very exploitable. That answers that.

Raising in this spot with a very above avg. for the situation allows you to play a big pot in position against what would amount to weaker player. You must not play a lot of stt if you think worse hands wont call you here. Should he call you, you would be in pretty good shape against his range. Raising is +cEV in this spot.

You are raising for value. Its pretty obvious. But when villain comes in for an all in reraise you have to stop and think why. It smells very much like a trap and A10 wouldnt stand up well against his range. Therefore you should fold.

You do want to create a big pot preflop. This is a SINGLE TABLE TOURNAMENT. I dont know if you get that at all. They are played primarily preflop. Thats the nature of the game.

Your thinking works best in cash games where you play deep or deep stacked tournaments. If you had 100bbs then yes, just flat and play accordingly. It makes perfect sense. But here, you sitting with a much smaller stack and blinds that elevate fairly quickly. You dont have time to make these kinds of elaborate plays. If you cant get that than you shouldnt play them. Stick to games where you play with deeper stacks. I know its hard to adjust to different types of games, but you need to to survive. GL I hope you can do it.

franxic
Member:
Posts: 47

"
I guess you prefer the passive aggressive approach huh? I should have guessed as much.
"

nope i just think that is not a spot where aggression benefits u. my opponents definitely percieve me as aggressive, and i raise lots of hands here.

"
If you play like you said all the time you are a very predictable player and very exploitable. That answers that.
"

can u explain that? what hand will villain have me on after checking? how can he exploit my check? is raising here not even more exploitable and in fact exploited here? u raise all the time here, how can this be less predictable?

"
Raising in this spot with a very above avg. for the situation allows you to play a big pot in position against what would amount to weaker player. You must not play a lot of stt if you think worse hands wont call you here. Should he call you, you would be in pretty good shape against his range. Raising is +cEV in this spot.
"

well still i think a villain with a brain cant call here. would u? with which hand?
by raising u take ur postflop edge if u got one. positional advantage often gets u nowhere with a big portion af villains stack already committed.

raisin is +cEV in this spot, no doubt. villain will often fold here, again no doubt. but is checking -cEV for that reason? it obv. isn´t. maybe it wins u slightly less pots, but many of them will be bigger. In this particular spot u even win the pot by checking preflop and betting/raising the flop many times.

"
You are raising for value. Its pretty obvious. But when villain comes in for an all in reraise you have to stop and think why. It smells very much like a trap and A10 wouldnt stand up well against his range. Therefore you should fold.
"

since villain is unknown, u should fold, AT performs poorly against any somewhat reasonable 3bet- range.

that´s exactly the "u turn ur hand into a bluff" thing i mentioned. i hardly see myself valuebet/fold if villain isn´t ridiculous tight. how exploitable is this?

"
You do want to create a big pot preflop. This is a SINGLE TABLE TOURNAMENT. I dont know if you get that at all. They are played primarily preflop. Thats the nature of the game.
"

given the hero´s (>25BB) and villain´s (>13BB) i can´t really see why exclude postflop play. no one is desperate in any way now. does hero really want to play a big pot with a tricky hand like AT here? if villain does, how do u do against his range, even if he plays Ax oop?

i prefer keeping the pot small here. u got position, if u check u can often easily take the pot on any flop. a pot size bet on the flop asks him if he wants to get his hole stack involved, but is just 1/13 of ur stack. that is the situation i want to have him in. will he fold the flop if u raised preflop? with more than 30% of his stack already in?

since i prefer to analyze a hand regarding the actual stacksizes given the actual blinds the type of tourney is not really relevant. rising blinds often are an issue. here there are well... not really. u just paid a big blind. if blinds rise, u still have nearly 20BB. does that put any pressure on u? compared to the smaller stacks, has ur situation got any worse or did theirs?

rising blinds are an issue u always have to factor in in any type of tournament. i did that.

"
Your thinking works best in cash games where you play deep or deep stacked tournaments. If you had 100bbs then yes, just flat and play accordingly. It makes perfect sense. But here, you sitting with a much smaller stack and blinds that elevate fairly quickly. You dont have time to make these kinds of elaborate plays. If you cant get that than you shouldnt play them. Stick to games where you play with deeper stacks. I know its hard to adjust to different types of games, but you need to to survive. GL I hope you can do it.
"

I obv. raise it in a cash game. different story.

i already played some tourneys and did survive.

My play differs from urs, and that´s ok. i give quite some reasons for my play. ur reasoning pretty much is "u gotta raise it´s a stt". in a forum like this discussions should be about the hand and not about someone´s potentially limited insight. show me where i´m wrong - everything is kind of discussable, isn´t it? i wanna learn from the experts here! "That´s the nature of the game" gets me or anyone else reading this nowhere.

so if u or anyone else have kind of deeper thoughts about the hand, i´m looking forward to read them.

franxic

wshuwerhere
Member:
Posts: 21

Ive given more than enough reasons for my play. If you dont get them by now, then I cant help you. Your reasoning is is pretty basic. You skew the info to favor your position. I could do that and be right too. But I wont.

You have yet to actually make a decent argument for why this would be a good play in a stt. In fact, you point out facts that favor the opposite of your stance. Its silly really.

You claim that raising here turns your hand into a bluff. How so? You raise for VALUE. Thats it. If I raise and then fold to a push its not a bluff. Why? Because villain's options arent push/fold. If they were than I would check. But villain will call enough here. I know you dont think this is possible, but you are making a terrible mistake by thinking so. You give your opponents too much credit. Just because you wouldnt make that play doesnt mean your opponents wont. They will. Often.

This is my last post on this unless you actually post something different. Im tired of responding to the same post over and over again.

franxic
Member:
Posts: 47

franxic wrote:

"so if {...} anyone else has kind of deeper thoughts about the hand, i´m looking forward to read them."