I saw guy having over 900 roi and with over 300 games mtt
(nick: LOL_FAILURE 294 $1,065 $60 962% $313,196 Tilt 91 PokerStars Sch. Only)
How is this possible? He still has over 300 games and also ab 91/100.
300 games is no sample size at all. It's called a heater.
there is a highest possible roi. 900% is easy over 300 games. all he had to do was win one tourney with 20,000 entrants and then play 299 more games.
ok.. wait.. how high is it?
I guess if you satellite into the WSOP Main Event and win it you can have like 1,000,000,000% ROI or something
highest roi would be like playing one of the guiness tourneys. $1 buy in or something and 150,000 players. say winner got 20,000. your roi would be 2,000,000% roi, right? think i did math right.
right for that tourney, but how high is the highest possible roi if u think there is one?
if it´s 150,001 players it would be higher. since it´s always possible that there is one more participant, there is no highest possible roi. what about winner-takes-all? overlay?
no point in wondering what the highest roi is for somebody over 1 game. the question is what is the highest possible roi for somebody who plays $11-$55 tourneys, or whatever, over 2k games or so.
or the average of the top 50 players with that criteria. my guess is 600% roi. just an educated guess.
we can argue with the 600% because its just a guess
lol wut
don´t u agree that even if u are the best player in the world with a roi never reached before over one or ten million games that there is a higher roi still possible?
i don´t care anyway. just think it´s funny.
there is no highest possible roi.
say u play a tourney with 50000 players. winner takes 15% of the price pool, which means he wins 15000 times his buy in. his roi will be 1500000%.